Is it just me, or does the following say something about the theoretical status of the gid hanasheh of a dinosaur (ignoring, for the sake of humor, the fact that a dinosaur wouldn't be kosher anyways, and therefore since the gid hanasheh isn't considered part of the meat, eating it would be patur anyways): I'm quoting in translation because I'm too lazy to type it in or go find it in Hebrew(and I'm supposed to be doing homework anyways).
The prohibition against gid hanasheh does not apply with regard to a fow, because it does not have a [round] hip-socket. Instead, its thigh is long [and flat]. If there is a fow whose thigh is shaped like that of the thigh of an animal, i.e. it has a hip-socket, its gid hanasheh is forbidden, but one is not iable for lashes because of it. SImilarly, when there is an anima whose thigh is long like that of a fowl, its gid hanasheh is forbidden, but one is not liable for lashes for it.
I remember learning that dinosaurs have the same sorts of hip bones as birds...
The prohibition against gid hanasheh does not apply with regard to a fow, because it does not have a [round] hip-socket. Instead, its thigh is long [and flat]. If there is a fow whose thigh is shaped like that of the thigh of an animal, i.e. it has a hip-socket, its gid hanasheh is forbidden, but one is not iable for lashes because of it. SImilarly, when there is an anima whose thigh is long like that of a fowl, its gid hanasheh is forbidden, but one is not liable for lashes for it.
I remember learning that dinosaurs have the same sorts of hip bones as birds...