ext_260669 ([identity profile] fleurdelis28.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] debka_notion 2005-12-02 06:32 pm (UTC)

The idea of Jesus as antichrist is just too mind-boggling for words, though I suppose it adds up etymologically.

Of course, if he was just some guy, then isn't the spreading mostly Paul's domain? (Of course, if Paul had stayed out of it, maybe the result would have been a bunch of largely observant Jews who happened to have a conviction that their dead messiah was unprecedentedly awesome to some disputed degree, and coming back.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting