debka_notion (
debka_notion) wrote2006-03-08 11:47 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Really Weird Ritual Ideas
So I'm reading a book about women's lifecycle ritual in modern Judaism (Lifecycled, ed. Debra Orenstein), and there's this quote about a suggestion for a parallel to Brit Milah for baby girls: "IN the early 1970s, Mary Gendler proposed that the parallel to Brit Milah ought to involve the irtual breaking of the infant girl's hymen. THis would incorporate the blood ritual and genital elements of Brit MIlah and, at the same time, free the baby girl from teh strictures of virginity. Here, as in Brit Milah, the sign of the covenant would be located in connection to the organ of generation." Thankfully, it follows with this "Gendler's suggestion, while provocative, has not been followed." Thank G-d. Talk about Weirdness. (The book otherwise makes some very interesting and useful interpretations of Brit Milah for the parents, although I think some might push the gender issue stuff a little too far.) It was just a reminder of how weird ideas can get when you're not thinking realistically, and how odd people's values get in relation to ritual sometimes...
(I tend to be uncomfortable with a lot of really innovative ritual: it feels silly and fluffy to me most of the time. Occassionally I can get into some of it and find it spiritually useful and meaningful- but unless I'm in a very secure place and the other people are also willing to get into it, I just feel silly, and that makes the whole thing useless. This is less in relation to this sort of ridiculousness, and more in relation to all this new women's ritual in general. Besides my taking issue with all these physically-related rituals which Judaism as a general trend has moved away from and has generalized things to age, so that these things can be more private and because they have less to do with one's self in public. More on this topic will probably come up as I keep reading this stuff.)
(I tend to be uncomfortable with a lot of really innovative ritual: it feels silly and fluffy to me most of the time. Occassionally I can get into some of it and find it spiritually useful and meaningful- but unless I'm in a very secure place and the other people are also willing to get into it, I just feel silly, and that makes the whole thing useless. This is less in relation to this sort of ridiculousness, and more in relation to all this new women's ritual in general. Besides my taking issue with all these physically-related rituals which Judaism as a general trend has moved away from and has generalized things to age, so that these things can be more private and because they have less to do with one's self in public. More on this topic will probably come up as I keep reading this stuff.)
no subject
no subject
I'm not sure what material has addressed this, if any. I know there's a lot about blood and purity and the relationship between that stuff and organized ritualized religion... But directly linking the two? I don't know. It would be neat to explore though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2006-03-09 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
I agree that creating new ritual can be difficult to do well. But I'm not sure I want to move altogether away from physical rituals either.
I wonder if I can tell my husband that we're only having boys until this gets worked out? ;)
no subject
On the other hand, maybe adjusting to these rituals would make us all less nervous about other people finding out when we have our periods (at least, that seems to be the feeling I've seen from most people, and I have that myself, even if I think it ought to be silly) and all the other anxieties that come along with it. (I've seen all sorts of stuff on Mayim Rabim about finding ways not to show that you're in Niddah when at other people's houses or what not, for those folks who are strict about the no passing things and such like.)
Bar Mitzvo
Actually, there are a number of situations in which we still accept that definition. Basically, any time one needs to fulfill a hiyyuvo dheôraitho for someone else, the person who's doing the action must be Bar Mitzvo according to the anatomical definition. We certainly pasken this way with regard to teqi`ath shôfor, and writing tefillin / mezuzôth / sifrê thôro, and reading Poroshath Zokhôr. I'm pretty sure that many pôsqim rule this way even with regard to the reading of the Meghillo, because even though it is not de'ôraitho, it is considered to be of a higher status than purely derabbonon.
no subject
(Actually, it occurs to me that I'm more likely to self-censor telling a casual acquaintance that (say) I've been cranky because I have menstrual cramps -- as I'd say if I had a headache -- because I don't want to be seen as justifying or even offering grounds for justifying my behavior on a hormonal basis. Getting rid of a little of the mythology that menstruating women are OMGScary (and we have our share of that in rabbinic Judaism) would be worth a number of cheesy rituals.)
no subject
Hmmm...
Re: Hmmm...
Re: Hmmm...
Re: Hmmm...
Re: Hmmm...