So there's a general principle in halakha (Jewish law) that the law of the land is the law. (Dina d'malchuta dina, I think- I don't know Aramaic, so this is just what I remember a teacher telling me it was in high school. It was Rabbi Eli I think.) So, why do the orthodox/observant (pick the word of your choice) folks drink underage? If they're so stringent about other aspects of the law, why break one that's pretty easy to follow? SOmehow I'd think this would be a more common idea.

Note, this is not intended to be a criticism of anyone in particular- just a thought.

From: [identity profile] fleurdelis28.livejournal.com


My contracts professor, who is not generally on the liberal end of things, blinked when the class mentioned the under-21 rule (obviously this didn't apply to anyone in law school, but it came up in the context of something or other), and said that as far as he heard it only prohibited buying the alcohol, and didn't say anything about whether you drank it. (Do not cite this if the police catch you (you-world, not you-Maya), without having done some research of your own; it is not his field of law and neither is he, or I, under 21. But he may be right.)

That said, I'm almost positive there would be some dorm/undergrad restrictions involved in at least some of these cases. And I think there are also rules about overage drinkers buying specifically for minors.

From: [identity profile] strange-selkie.livejournal.com


....you and your professor are both right, at least as far as the last time I had the laws drilled into my head (for Stein Nights in 2001). In Massachusetts, you must be 21 to buy, but 18 to pour and 18 to drink. The laws regarding in whose hands a drink ends up then fall into place, to make sure not a lot of circumstances where this can happen actually exist.

From: [identity profile] shirei-shibolim.livejournal.com


I think this is a state-by-state matter. In New York, a zero-tolerance rule passed a few years ago makes it illegal for persons under 21 to drive with a BAC of .01% or higher.

Of course, it Massachusetts it's an arrestable crime to drive with a previously opened bottle of amaretto in a locked safe in your trunk. (As in, one may drive with sealed alcoholic beverages only, and there are no exceptions whatsoever.)

From: [identity profile] fleurdelis28.livejournal.com


Okay, after some brief web research:

There is no federal drinking age per _se_. Drinking laws are all issued by individual states (this may be why Prohibition had to be enacted by Constitutional amendment, though I seem to recall there were other reasons as well), and Congress has simply made a lot of federal highway funding contingent on states' setting their alcohol age at 21. So they do. Whether 21 is the minimum age for drinking, or just for purchase and possession, varies with the state. As do the other details like BAL and ID requirements.

From: [identity profile] shirei-shibolim.livejournal.com


Why did that make it necessary to amend the constitution? Why would a federal law not have sufficed?

From: [identity profile] fleurdelis28.livejournal.com


I'm not positive, but I think that degree of regulation of commerce was considered to be outside the ennumerated powers of Congress and therefore reserved to the states. Why they decided it didn't fall within the powers Congress explicitly does have to regulate interstate commerce, I'm not sure.

From: [identity profile] fleurdelis28.livejournal.com


Oh, right. Probably because the right to regulate interstate commerce does not mean the right to regulate intrastate commerce.

From: [identity profile] belu.livejournal.com


In Massachusetts, you must be 21 to buy, but 18 to pour and 18 to drink.

Interesting. Any source that you can point us at to verify that?

From: [identity profile] strange-selkie.livejournal.com


I do not recall the name of the (overlarge pamphlet) but the Stein, Brandeis' campus bar, received a copy from the state because at the time, people under 21 were the bar's staff. Self included. We were all required to read it and sign saying that we understood; it listed simplified -- un-legalese -- 'You Must' statements of the drinking laws and had the Great Seal of the Commonwealth on the front, along with a fun color section in the back showing various ID's from various states.
.

Profile

debka_notion: (Default)
debka_notion
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags