So there's a general principle in halakha (Jewish law) that the law of the land is the law. (Dina d'malchuta dina, I think- I don't know Aramaic, so this is just what I remember a teacher telling me it was in high school. It was Rabbi Eli I think.) So, why do the orthodox/observant (pick the word of your choice) folks drink underage? If they're so stringent about other aspects of the law, why break one that's pretty easy to follow? SOmehow I'd think this would be a more common idea.
Note, this is not intended to be a criticism of anyone in particular- just a thought.
Note, this is not intended to be a criticism of anyone in particular- just a thought.
From:
no subject
That said, I'm almost positive there would be some dorm/undergrad restrictions involved in at least some of these cases. And I think there are also rules about overage drinkers buying specifically for minors.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Of course, it Massachusetts it's an arrestable crime to drive with a previously opened bottle of amaretto in a locked safe in your trunk. (As in, one may drive with sealed alcoholic beverages only, and there are no exceptions whatsoever.)
From:
no subject
There is no federal drinking age per _se_. Drinking laws are all issued by individual states (this may be why Prohibition had to be enacted by Constitutional amendment, though I seem to recall there were other reasons as well), and Congress has simply made a lot of federal highway funding contingent on states' setting their alcohol age at 21. So they do. Whether 21 is the minimum age for drinking, or just for purchase and possession, varies with the state. As do the other details like BAL and ID requirements.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Interesting. Any source that you can point us at to verify that?
From:
no subject