Anyone else ever wonder how to judge fictional characters when they do something that doesn't mesh with your real-life values, but oughtn't matter for a fictional character?
I try to suspend judgement. Putting aside my own values, see if their behavior matches what I would consider proper values for their universe and situation. eg., in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress I don't in real life approve of the family situations that Heinlein describes, but I can see that in their situation and with their method of living, it all works. However, I don't in the Arthurian legend approve of Lancelot, because in his inability to deny himself that which he wants he destroys his friends and his kingdom. So he I still disapprove of, even putting my own values aside as much as possible.
Depends on the character. If they do what they do for apparently good reasons (apparent to them, if not necessarily to me as the reader), I try to give them the benefit of the doubt, much as I would give a close friend the benefit of the doubt; extreme situations and the moral judgments that result from them are, after all, what makes a lot of such fiction interesting, so it's worth trying to apply their logic to things and seeing where it gets you. The only situation in which I find this difficult to apply is if the character in question is of a very nihilistic bent; that's simply too distant from my own world-conception for me to try to relate to it.
Heh, I just realized that most of my favorite fictional characters fit this criterion -- having to make morally questionable decisions -- in one way or another. It's kind of part of the business of being a science fiction protagonist, generally speaking -- even the Doctor has made plenty of less-than-ideal choices in his day.
From:
no subject
They're not hurting anybody. They're fictional characters, after all.
From:
Suspension of judgement
From:
no subject
From:
no subject