So the egal minyan at JTS does not give the first and second aliyot to a kohen and levi, respectively. However today the person to whom they gave the first aliyah was a kohen. And they went on about their usual progression, so the next person was not a levi, nor did they give the second aliyah to the same person. And I understand not giving out aliyot based on that status issue, and since it was established for the sake of peace, I wouldn't complain about a minyan that does not hold by it for the sake of peace. But once you do call a kohen for the aliyah- I do wonder what the best choice of action would have been. On the other hand, they had handed out the aliyot in advance, and I know that once you call someone, you don't replace them, even if you should have called someone else- so maybe handing out the aliyot has some of the same status. It's just an interesting thing to think about.
.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Honoring a communal leader by calling them up as "moreinu ve-rabbeinu" is emminently reasonable as long as it's done regardless of title (and I'm pretty sure the Ortho-egal minyan at Pardes called up our female teachers w/o semikha as moreinu, and perhaps rabbeinu), but once you've done that, why not have a special aliyah set aside for them as well?
*(And to some degree, it matters much less to me whether they actually go back to Aharon ha-Kohen than that we can maintain a plausible enough local family story that then ties into the greater story of the Jewish people -- i.e., we should have a statistically reasonable number of kohanim and levi'im who can prove their ancestry for a few generations to create plausibility.)
From:
no subject
And in a shul that duchens, it is a mark of something they do for the community, no? So if one's community were to do both, even though that opens another can of worms...